
Understanding Locality of Behaviour in Software Design
Description
In this episode, we explore the Locality of Behaviour (LoB) principle with expert Carson Gross. LoB emphasizes clarity in how code units behave, allowing developers to easily understand functionality without navigating through multiple files. Carson illustrates this concept with a comparison between htmx and jQuery, highlighting the importance of maintaining a clear relationship between code and its behavior for better maintainability. We also discuss the trade-offs between LoB and other fundamental principles like DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) and Separation of Concerns, providing insights on how developers can balance clarity, abstraction, and maintainability in modern software development. Tune in for valuable strategies and tips on navigating these complex design principles.
Show Notes
## Key Takeaways
1. Locality of Behaviour (LoB) enhances code maintainability by making behavior obvious on inspection.
2. Comparing htmx and jQuery demonstrates the importance of clear relationships between code and behavior.
3. There are trade-offs between LoB and principles like DRY and Separation of Concerns, requiring developers to make context-driven decisions.
## Topics Discussed
- Locality of Behaviour (LoB)
- Comparison of htmx and jQuery
- DRY principle and its conflicts with LoB
- Separation of Concerns and clarity in code
Topics
Transcript
Host
Welcome back to the podcast! Today, we’re diving into a fascinating concept in software development called the Locality of Behaviour, or LoB for short. To help us understand this principle, we have Carson Gross, an expert in this field. Carson, welcome!
Expert
Thanks for having me! I'm excited to be here.
Host
Great! So, let's start with the basics—what exactly is the Locality of Behaviour?
Expert
The Locality of Behaviour principle basically states that the behavior of a unit of code should be obvious just by looking at that unit. In other words, when you inspect a piece of code, you should be able to understand what it does without needing to dive into multiple files or sections.
Host
That makes sense! Can you give us an example to illustrate this?
Expert
Sure! Let's compare two ways of handling a button click that makes an AJAX request. In htmx, you might have a simple button like this: `<button hx-get="/clicked">Click Me</button>`. The behavior is clear and directly tied to the button itself.
Host
And what’s the alternative?
Expert
In jQuery, you might write something like this: `$('#d1').on('click', function() { $.ajax({ /* options... */ }); });` Here, the button is separated from its behavior, which is scattered across potentially multiple files. It’s a classic case of ‘spooky action at a distance’—you can’t easily tell what happens when you click that button without knowing the whole codebase.
Host
That sounds like it could lead to a lot of confusion when maintaining the code.
Expert
Exactly! The clearer the relationship between the code and its behavior, the easier it is to maintain, which is why LoB is so important.
Host
Now, I understand that there are trade-offs involved with LoB. Can you explain some of those conflicts?
Expert
Absolutely. One major conflict is with the DRY principle, which stands for 'Don’t Repeat Yourself.' Developers often aim to reduce redundancy in their code. For example, htmx allows you to place attributes on parent elements to avoid repetition in child elements, but this can violate LoB because it obscures the behavior of child elements.
Host
So, it seems like sometimes you have to choose between clarity and avoiding redundancy.
Expert
Exactly! Another principle that can conflict with LoB is Separation of Concerns, which encourages developers to separate different parts of a program, like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. But when you inline styles or behaviors, you might sacrifice that separation for clarity.
Host
That sounds like a delicate balance to strike. How can developers navigate these trade-offs?
Expert
It’s all about making subjective decisions based on the context. If the behavior is only a few lines away from the code unit, the violation of LoB is less severe than if it’s in a different file. Developers need to be mindful of where they place behaviors in relation to the code they affect.
Host
Thanks, Carson! This has been a really enlightening conversation about the Locality of Behaviour. I appreciate you breaking it down for us.
Expert
My pleasure! It's been great discussing it.
Host
And to our listeners, thanks for tuning in. Until next time, keep questioning and keep learning!
Create Your Own Podcast Library
Sign up to save articles and build your personalized podcast feed.